[docent_users] Re: Nested Blendeds?

Thanks, I guess we'll give it a try and see what happens.

--- In docent_users@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Taylor" <robertt@...> wrote:
>
> Ellen,
>
> It is done fairly regulary, but I think the problem comes with managing
> these when they get too deep more than the code itself. I generally
don't
> recommend more than three layers deep including the main course level.
>
> Also, if you have any kind of bulk loading of external transcripts,
you need
> a mechanism that will force the transcripts to 'recalculate' the
completion
> criteria of the BLAs and update the transcript.
>
> Robert Taylor
> President, RT Networks
> Integrating your LMS with your business processes
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: docent_users@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:docent_users@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Ellen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 5:55 AM
> To: docent_users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [docent_users] Nested Blendeds?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have any experience using nested blended activities?
>
> We have a course where it seems like the perfect solution would be
several
> alternate
> blended activities, grouped into a single blended activity with a
> certification assigned to it.
>
> However I recall seeing somewhere in the code that nesting blendeds
beyond a
> certain
> point can lead to unexpected results. I think they warned against
nesting
> more than one
> layer deep. Has anyone ever tried it?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ellen
>
> _________________
> http://thedesignspa <http://thedesignspace.net> ce.net
>